|
|
Tax cuts vs Super Fund Tax cuts - $3 billion available Advantages
Disadvantages
Other issues How much room does $3 billion give you? Not much
Outcome Virtually nothing for 77% of taxpayers.
Super Fund Advantages
Reduction in numbers on welfare. Better use of state assets. Elimination of wasteful government expenditure. Elimination of government debt. Students with no chance of passing university or technical institute exams not enticed to try. Budget surplus reduced and therefore not available for the Labour Government to waste. (See appendix 2 - How paid for) Dealing with the issue of retirement also provides us with the opportunity to largely solve the social problems facing New Zealand. How? By changing the incentives people face.
The yearly superannuation contributions are the key to changing the current welfare state incentive system. How? By making people worse off i.e. they lose money when they are on welfare or accident compensation, rather than receive an income from the government or a government body. People are rewarded when they are providing for themselves and their families by way of lower taxes and a $4,000 contribution to the individual's superannuation account. A non-working partner whose husband or wife is in work would also receive a $4,000 contribution to their superannuation account. However people not in work between the ages 18-65 (on accident compensation, sickness or unemployment benefit, at university or a technical institute) would have to draw down on the superannuation contributions they would otherwise have received that year before any other help is provided by the government or in the case of a couple, both their contributions. They are in effect spending what would otherwise have been their own money. Retirement policy
Welfare policy to go with retirement changes Solution - Social Welfare, Accident, Sickness, Unemployment
Employer responsibility - (awards, legislation) Individuals - any stand down period (unemployment).
Over time, as these elements of welfare are privatised, the cost to government of meeting accident, sickness and unemployment benefits would reduce to around 10% of what it is today. Solution - Domestic Purpose Benefit - Existing Beneficiaries
Solution - Domestic Purposes Benefit- Future Beneficiaries Under 18 All benefits and allowances for young people under the age of 18 will be abolished and support for young people aged 16 and 17 without income, e.g. DPB or unemployed will be the responsibility of parents who will in special circumstances be able to draw down on their superannuation fund contributions and those of the father. Emergency assistance in special circumstances will be available for those estranged from their families. Government would draw down on families superannuation rights for that year to help meet any costs. Over 18 - Solo Parents (never married) Solo Parents would draw down on: Their own superannuation rights for the year The father's superannuation rights for the year before A government benefit was available. Given the fact that most schools - pre-school, primary and secondary, now open for business around 7.30 am and remained open until at least 5.30 pm solo parents would be expected to look for part-time or full-time work. The educational tax credit available to solo parents who work either part or full-time could be adjusted to take into account the extra costs involved. Over 18 Solo Parents (previously married) - Both parents working: Given the hours schools are now open both parents would be expected to continue to work. Caregivers tax-free income level would reflect new situation. If non-caregiver failed to meet any support payments due, then non-caregiver's super would be available to caregiver. Over 18 Solo Parents (previously married) - Caregiver not working Caregiving solo parent would draw down on: Own super rights Non-caregiver's support payments Non-caregiver's super rights (if b not paid) before A government benefit was available Given the fact that most schools - pre-school, primary and secondary, now open for business around 7.30 am and remained open until at least 5.30 pm solo parents would be expected to look for part-time or full-time work. The educational tax credit available to solo parents who work either part or full-time could be adjusted to take into account the extra costs involved. Cost to Government These changes would reduce the cost to government of meeting DPB payments to less than 40% immediately and 20% over time. |