ACT has begun a primary election campaign with the purpose of helping caucus
choose a new leader. This afternoon I want to examine what qualities ACT members
should be looking for in the person who gets their vote. Remembering that all
great leaders have integrity and are usually exceptional in 3 or 4 other areas
(qualities) while using others with exceptional qualities in areas they are not
so strong in.
Before outlining the qualities I will be judging candidates on, I wish to
make one other point - past actions, past behaviour is the best guide to future
actions - Leopards don't change their spots.
What then are the top qualities I will be looking for when I vote for the
next ACT Leader?
Top Qualities:
Has integrity
I will ask myself:
- Who among the candidates acts at all times with honesty and integrity in
his/her dealings with others?
- Who is genuine and sincere and does not seek to manipulate other people?
- Who always says what they mean and acts accordingly? Who is true to
themselves?
- Who would I trust to raise my children or look after my money if the need
arose?
Acts with conviction and builds positive relationships
- If you had a problem who would you approach knowing that your problem
would not be talked about with anyone else?
- Who is best suited to ensure the ACT Team work together to achieve their
stated goals.
Has a sense of purpose
- Quality leaders always stand for something, they have a clear sense of
direction and a set of core values and beliefs that drive them at all times.
Which candidates have this important characteristic?
Ability to recognise what is important
- Good leaders spend their time on what is important. They concentrate on
the task at hand and do not get side-tracked. They have the ability to
concentrate their efforts towards important outcomes. Discipline is always
more important than natural ability.
Effective Leaders are consistent and predictable
- They do not fiddle around with inconsequential matters or issues (such
leaders end up as mediocre ones).
Has a vision
- A picture of what New Zealand would be like if everything were operating
according to the plan they articulate. Which candidate best articulates your
vision?
- Is capable of translating that vision into specific objectives and then
- Building support for the vision.
Mistakes
- Big important leaders have always been prepared to admit mistakes and
change course if need be. Great leaders keep their ego under control. They
recognise that popularity is temporary, respect forever. They always believe
in something bigger than themselves and they demonstrate it on a day by day
basis.
Listen
- All leaders need guidance, which of the candidates is most likely to:
- Listen to their staff before they make a decision?
- Surround themselves with quality staff, not friends or people who will
simply say "Yes Minister"?
- Look at the staff and you see the person.
Has character
- What sort of characteristics do you want in your leader? Think about
recent and current leaders (Peters, Brash, Clark, Prebble etc) and ask which
of the characteristics they have do I like or not like and then think of our
candidates.
- Leaders treat others with respect. They keep their word. They make
decisions with the organisation in mind (ACT) rather than their own personal
agenda. They are open and transparent.
Recognition
- Who among the candidates is most likely to recognise and praise good
performance?
- Who will allow other ACT members a place in the sun and not feel
threatened by it?
- Who is most likely to recognise their own strengths and weaknesses,
especially weaknesses and cover them adequately?
- Who will best establish goals for ACT and ensure that they are translated
into action plans for MPs and others?
- Who will inspire others to high performance?
Remember, without integrity, nothing else matters - win, win, win if you can
but integrity at all costs.